First there was SOPA. Then there was ACTA. Now there’s new piece of legislation that’s poised to severely undermine the rights of Internet users: the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA.
Unlike SOPA, CISPA isn’t primarily concerned with piracy; rather it’s designed to help government agencies and businesses share “cyber threat information.” The legislation, which is co-sponsored by Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), and has the backing of Facebook, IBM, Verizon and AT&T, to name a few, is supposed to get rid of barriers that limit interaction in cases of security threats.
Just like SOPA, individuals and companies against CISPA are concerned less about the intention of the bill and more about the unintended consequences its vague and broad language may have on existing Internet rights. For example, in the phrase “cyber threat information” what does the word “threat” mean? Could a private email, Facebook or Twitter update, or an individual’s Web browsing history be considered a threat? If these types of user behaviors are targeted then the government could bypass laws that otherwise keep companies from sharing this information.
